Lekatt’s Box

Picture a large room with a table set in the middle. The table has an object upon it, a black box. There is no writing or nary a mark of any kind that can be seen on the box. This box seems to be about 12 inches in height, width, and depth. It can’t be approached closer than 12 feet or touched or moved in any way due to the nature of this puzzle. Upon the discovery of this box, scientists are called in to determine its contents and reason for being there. They mull around the table observing the box from every angle. Using their critical thinking, and past experiences with boxes of all colors, each scientist puts forth an hypothesis of what the box contains and what its purpose might be. There is discussion as to whose thoughts seem the most rational given the circumstances. Finally after days of critical thought, discussion, and wrangling, a theory is formed. Most of the scientists agree with the theory that the black box is a recording device that has been misplaced, but there are one or two that don’t agree with this theory. A press conference is called and the theory announced: “the black box is a misplaced recording device.” The next day after the announcement a janitor wanders into the room to clean the floor and empty the trash baskets. He notices the black box, but not the nature of the puzzle. Walking up to the box, he picked it up, and turned it over revealing the label of the contents, it was a basketball, addressed to the owner of the building.

The moral here is no amount of critical thinking, hypothesizing, or theorizing will ever be as good as personal experience. Getting up close and personal is the path to knowledge of all things. Near death experiences are the reports of individuals who have experienced them. Lived them, saw them, felt them. and understood them. There are thousands of NDEs posted on the web. Skeptics would have us believe all these thousands of individuals are either lying, having illusions, dissociating (whatever that means), or are just ignorant and irresponsible. That they are not intelligent enough to know what they saw, felt, and heard. That only people like skeptics, who have never had an experience know more about NDEs than those that actually experienced them. For science to call all personal experience “anecdotal” and therefor unreliable is a joke on science. Especially when scientists use their own personal experience every day, because they have too, there is no substitute for personal experience. The general public understands better than science the importance personal experience. Seventy-four percent of the general public believe that near death experiences are real. But the final kicker is in the reading of them. Anyone who reads, studies, and learns about NDEs know that it would be impossible for them to have happened locally in the brain.

Now the reason for this post is to show life continues after death. If you would like to read some NDEs you can find them here: A collection of NDEs.
_________________
Experience is the thing you have left when everything else is gone.

© 2007 – 2018, Lekatt. All rights reserved.

Spiritual Experience

Physical reality is not really a distraction, but a plane of existence we are now experiencing. Picture yourself standing on the edge of two dimensions. Looking out we see the physical and looking in we see the spiritual. When we move our focus off the physical through meditation or other practices that focus the mind, we can experience the spiritual.

I will never recommend using drugs to accomplish this due to several things. Drugs have harmful side effects to the body. One never knows how the drug experience will go, some are good and some bad, and then there is the addiction problem. There is really no shortcut to spiritual growth. One must walk the path, and the path can be long, but when the goal is accomplished there is a great feeling of peace, truth, and love that lasts forever. Something no drug will ever give you.

© 2007 – 2019, Lekatt. All rights reserved.

The Belief Effect

Your beliefs, thoughts, and expectations create your future. They can give you a happy, peaceful existence, or turn your life into a living hell. It is important you examine the “what and why” of your beliefs concerning everything you come into contact with during your physical life.

We have proof of this in the form of the placebo effect. 

The American Heritage Dictionary defines placebo effect as:

NOUN: The beneficial effect in a patient following a particular treatment that arises from the patient’s expectations concerning the treatment rather than from the treatment itself.

Mark Twain said: “Some people think they can, and some think they can’t. Both are correct.”

So, if you are waiting around for someone to find a cure for unhappiness. You might want to examine your beliefs and expectations in the light of truth, and logic while you are waiting.

© 2007 – 2009, Lekatt. All rights reserved.

Q & A – 25 Evolution or Intelligent Design?

Question: What about it, Evolution or Intelligent Design?Answer: Yes, Evolution or Intelligent Design, actually it is both:This question looms large in the theist vs. atheist conflict. Evolution and Intelligent Design are often thought to be opposites, one defining a solely materialistic world, and the other a world of greater dimensions, including “God.” But Evolution and Intelligent Design are not opposites. Neither do they prove nor disprove the existence of “God.”

To begin, all deductive thoughts as to the beginnings of this Universe are theory, guesses, nothing more. No person, text, data, ancient tomes, research, or whatever, can enlighten us as to where the energy, matter, and/or intent to bring this Universe forth, came from. On this point all humans are at square one.

Evolution:

The Evolutionists contend a series of random events started life on earth. Certain chemicals came together in the right proportions to create life. From there, interaction with the environment, chance events, and survival needs, caused these life forms to modify into ever-more complex forms until we humans finally emerged. Assuming evolution is correct, next, we ask the question of cosmic origins. How did the planets, stars, galaxies, etc., end up as they are today? Here the Evolutionist points to the “Big Bang.” A theorized cosmic explosion that marked the beginning and creation of the universe as we know it. Even if we accept both these theories as correct there is still the question of Intelligent Design within Evolution and Big Bang to be considered.

So the question for Evolutionists is: how did “order” emerge from a “random” creation?

If this Universe had its beginnings in random events, how and where did the order and cooperation self-evident in this world come from? What or whose intelligence directed the planets to follow their orbits? If they followed random orbits life would not last long. If gravity holds them in orbit, what holds gravity? If the force of gravity was random how long would earth last? There is also great cooperation between flora and fauna, enabling the survival of both. The order observed in our universe implies intelligence, higher intelligence than us humans, shaping and directing the forces of gravity, energy, and matter that make up our cosmology. In fact, the field of science could not exist in a random world. Science depends on such things as laws, and ordered repeatable experiments. The laws of Gravity. The laws of Physics. The laws of Electro-Magnetic Forces. All these things are self-evident of the order/intelligence working in our world. Order appears only through intelligent direction. Order is the product of intelligence, the more intelligence the more order.

Comments:

For the sake of argument, we could assume both order and randomness exist in our world. Some things random and some things ordered. Notice that this assumption eliminates neither order nor randomness, so both sides of this argument would win.

My own feelings are that randomness never existed. “Higher Intelligence” used the tools of “evolution,” and the “big bang” (here I am theorizing with theories) to put into motion the creation of our world and is guiding it along a path. Still guiding it today. I don’t believe evolution and the big bang are finished. Creation is an on-going process, never-ending, eternal. While those things that have seemed to be random to us, are events beyond our ability to understand or “see” the patterns that lie within them. As the child can not understand adult logic, so we can not understand the logic of the Creative Higher Intelligence.

Now, just because I agree with “Intelligent Design” doesn’t mean I agree with the proponents of “Intelligent Design.” I do not believe “God” as defined by religious doctrines exists. He is not the “higher intelligence” that created this universe

Intelligent Design:

Proponents of Intelligent Design argue that “God” created the universe, and everything in it including us humans according to the account in the Christian Bible. We can expand this and include all religions who believe a “God” in written or spoken form created this universe. Actually, we can include any theory of creation which believes “God” played the role of Creator. But if we accept any of these theories as correct, how will we know we have chosen the right “God”.

So the question for proponents of Intelligent Design is how do you define the “Intelligence” that designed and created our universe? How do you define “God”?

In the religious writings of the world “God” is defined as good, hateful, loving, angry, unchanging, caring, jealous, judgmental, punishing, unchanging, forgiving, compassionate, omniscience, warring, unchanging, ubiquitous, faithful, unfaithful, controlling, unchanging, a supreme ruler, the ultimate reality, lord almighty, a divine king; also, as loving his children, sacrificing his children, burning his children in eternal fire, unchanging, saving his children, controlling his children, and giving his children free will, etc., and that’s only the Christian religion. No wonder people can’t agree on what “God” stands for or represents. When someone tells me “God” wants me to do something, I wonder how they know the mind of “God” so to speak for Him. I wonder why “God” didn’t tell me personally.

Comments:

We can not find the answer in books, old or new. Most religious people become Godless when you take the Bible out of their hand. The only definitions they have ever known are Biblical doctrine. Other sacred religious texts offer no clearer definitions nor more logical concepts of God. So if we can’t read God out of a book how do we know s/he exists or what s/he wants us to do?

The reason words fail, is because God can’t be understood by logic and/or intellect alone. It is through our emotional feelings that we are able to know God. Yes, our feelings are a reliable source of knowledge. Just as reliable as our ears and eyes which put together with taste, smell, and touch form our personal experiences. Feelings, intuitions, frequently called the “sixth sense” are an integral part of our humanness. They are the spiritual nature of mankind.

The only place to look for the Creator is within the creation. Can we look at the Universe, the millions of life-forms within it, and discover the mind of the Creator? Can we look within ourselves and others, finding, understanding the path to God. Yes, I believe we can. In studying religion for many years, I find the only word people agree defines God, is Love. Love is what you feel, Love or God is a spiritual event.

Thousands of near death experiencers will tell you they have been in the presence of God, felt God’s love for them and experienced many things. Yet, they will also tell you their experience can’t be put into words. When written, the words just don’t match the feelings.

Conclusion:

So we have come to a logical conclusion that “Intelligent Design” or “Higher Intelligence” was the most likely cause that brought forth, from nothingness, our universe. The tools of evolution, big bang, and probably many other tools, unknown to us, could have been used to accomplish this task. But, we still don’t have a definition, other than Love, of this “Higher Intelligence” (God) or its motivation. Here, I believe, we are on our own. Each individual must look within themselves to discover God (Love).

Ending Comments:

“Think outside of the box.” A common phrase today, spoken by many, followed by few.

Belief systems like religion and science build boxes around themselves. The walls of these boxes are made of rules, procedures, processes, rituals, doctrines, laws, etc. The walls are designed to protect the authority and prestige of those individuals enclosed. But they “keep out” as much knowledge as they preserve.

Our world is without limits, constantly growing, being renewed, and unfolding its challenges upon us daily. Personal experiences reveal a spirituality that is also without limits. The spiritual and the physical merge, and swirl together through endless events and endless ages. It is the dance of life. Only through Love can the dance be observed and joined. “Think outside the box.”

Definitions:

A few dictionary definitions of the words used in the above writings:Evolution: a theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modifications in successive generations.

Intelligent Design: a design having or indicating a high or satisfactory degree of intelligence and mental capacity b : revealing or reflecting good judgment or sound thought.

Randomness: lacking a definite plan, purpose, or pattern b : made, done, or chosen at random, determined by accident rather than design. Random stresses lack of definite aim, fixed goal, or regular procedure.

Intelligence: a (1) : the ability to learn or understand or to deal with new or trying situations : REASON; also : the skilled use of reason (2) : the ability to apply knowledge to manipulate one’s environment or to think abstractly as measured by objective criteria (as tests) b Christian Science : the basic eternal quality of divine Mind

Order: means to put persons or things into their proper places in relation to each other. Order suggests a straightening out so as to eliminate confusion, implies arranging so that the whole aggregate works as a unit with each element having a proper function.

© 2007 – 2010, Lekatt. All rights reserved.

Page 180 of 185
1 179 180 181 185